There is an inherit problem with having zero copays for our “less fortunate” friends. Lets look at two cases.
Mary is a 35 year old single working mom. Her ‘baby daddy’ left her high and dry when the going got tough. By using daycare through her family, she is able to pull off a part time job and qualifies only for food stamps. She is not eligible for full-scope welfare due to the inherit racism that goes on within the welfare system (yeah, I went there, ignoring it wont make it go away). She forgoes the fancy cell-phone, cable-tv, and nice car to afford health insurance for her and her baby (which shes fine with, she views insurance as a necessary expense like food). Her copays are $50/rx.
Jacob is a 45 year old male. Due to heavy cocaine use during his youth he has congestive heart failure and as a result is unable to work (according to him and his quack doctor). He recieves full-scope welfare complete with food-stamps and a check every month. He spends his day harassing his pharmacy about refilling his pain-pills early and enjoys watching daytime TV. His copay is $0/rx.
Both Mary and Jacob bring you an Rx for some Flovent. Mary pays $50 and Jacob pays $0 for the same Rx. Both leave your store drugs in hand.
A week later, Jacob calls you and says he lost his Flovent. He has spend a whole 4 min’s looking for it and demands he gets a replacement at once. Mary also calls you a week later. She has torn her entire house apart looking for this Flovent and is reluctant to ask for a replacement Flovent at the cost of about $175. Jacob is upset at YOU that the insurance wont pay for it early, and Mary is upset at HERSELF for losing something that cost her $50.
See where this is going?
There is a HUGE problem with giving people medications for free. The problem is that once something is free, people see no value to it. Sure Jacob lost a Flovent or Blood Glucose Monitor, but because to him its free, why should he spend any of his valuable time to actually look for it vs just calling and getting another one for free. Mary has an incentive to tear her house apart (or call her insurance company) looking for the lost Flovent because it COST her $50. Jacob is out nothing, and Mary is out something. Jacob gets everything handed to him while Mary busts her ass. Both are “in need”, but their reasons for being “in need” is another rant for another day.
Mary obviously places a value on her Rx’s. Even if shes oblivious to the true cost of the medications (and how much her insurance company pays), shes quite aware to HER cost for those medications. Jacob, on the other hand couldn’t care less how much his lost medication has cost the state because HIS cost is a whopping zero. Who cares if he lost every medication on his profile in an act that was entirely his fault, he’s out nothing short of the inconvenience of driving to the pharmacy and picking them up again. He wont have to choose medication or rent, and his check wont be impacted in the least. Mary isn’t so lucky.
Lets put it this way; by getting drugs for $0, there is no negative-feedback/punishment/repercussions for losing medication. Medication has a net-worth of $0 to them, and they don’t give two fucks what happens to their medication because their lives are not financially impacted by losing them. If I spend $50 on something, and I misplace it, I’m sure a shit going to tear everything apart looking for it. Is it the same if I spend $0 on something?
Think of this next time you fill that ER prescription for Tylenol and Robatussin DM.
- Trying to not kill your patients.
- An open letter to my patients.
- The FDA obviously hates the public and needs to lay off the crack pipe.
- How to make your pharmacy career less painful.
- Cleanup on aisle 4.. now 5… oh damn.
- Shooting yourself in the foot, 10% at a time.
- All in the same boat
- Careastatin, 0 refills remaining.
- How to succeed at retail pharmacy according to the chains
- The dreaded RTS